Blogs

CLA Professionals Answer Recently Heard Questions on Lease Accounting

  

By Airam Valdez of CliftonLarsonAllen
Published June 28, 2022


Key insights

  • The new lease standard is here and effective now.
  • The core principle of Topic 842 is that all leases (with minimal exceptions for certain leases) create an asset and a liability for the lessee.
  • Review answers to our top five questions asked below


Recently, our national assurance technical group hosted a webinar discussing the implementation and adoption of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 842, Leases. During this discussion we received a number of questions — and we’ve responded to the five most frequently asked.

 

  1. Do I have to apply this standard if I report my financial statements on a tax basis of accounting or any other special purpose framework?

 

Entities who report under a special purpose framework are not required to comply with the requirements in Topic 842 unless the framework dictates this accounting standard should be followed. In addition, it’s important to note that U.S. GAAS and the SSARS require that when special purpose financial statements contain items that are the same as, or similar to, those in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, those financial statements should include informative disclosures similar to those required by U.S. GAAP.

 

  1. What type of arrangements are in scope and out of scope for this new standard?

 

The criteria for determining whether an arrangement meets the definition of a lease under Topic 842 are similar to Topic 840. As a reminder, a lease is defined as a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant, or equipment (an identified asset) for a period of time in exchange for consideration.

If the lessee does not have the right to control the use of an identified asset, then the arrangement may not qualify as a lease.

Furthermore, Topic 842 does not apply to any of the following, which are covered by other accounting guidance:

  • Leases of intangible assets [includes software] (see Topic 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other)
  • Leases to explore for or use minerals, oil, natural gas, and similar nonregenerative resources (see Topics 930, Extractive Activities — Mining, and 932, Extractive Activities — Oil and Gas)
  • Leases of biological assets, including timber (see Topic 905, Agriculture)
  • Leases of inventory (see Topic 330, Inventory)
  • Leases of assets under construction (see Topic 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment)

 

  1. I only have a few “small” leases. Do I really have to apply this new standard if I believe the impact will not be significant to my organization?

 

Topic 842 does not contain a specific materiality threshold for the recognition of a lease; however, paragraph BC122 of ASU 2016-02 states: “Entities will likely be able to adopt reasonable capitalization thresholds below which lease assets and lease liabilities are not recognized, which should reduce the costs of applying the guidance. An entity’s practice in this regard may be consistent with many entities’ accounting policies in other areas of GAAP (for example, in capitalizing purchases of property, plant, and equipment).”

This materiality consideration should take into account the purpose of the standard while also weighing reporting that is meaningful to the readers of the financial statements.

 

  1. I have short-term leases; do I have to apply this new standard to them?

 

A lessee can elect (by asset class) for short-term leases not to record on the balance sheet a lease that, at the commencement date, has a lease term that is 12 months or less and does not include a purchase option that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise. The 12-month threshold for the short-term lease exemption is a bright-line exception to the lessee recognition requirements in Topic 842. This accounting policy, if elected, would be applied by underlying asset class and would result in a lessee’s recognition of its lease payments in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term and variable lease payments in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred. Judgement should be exercised when assessing this exemption as a variety of facts and circumstances may impact the ability of the entity to qualify for this exemption.

 

  1. I have related-party leases, what is the big deal about these?

 

Prior to the adoption of Topic 842, related parties were required to consider the economic substance of related-party arrangements. Economic substance relates to the underlying economic or commercial purpose of a business transaction verses its legal form. Topic 842 now requires related parties to consider the legal enforceability of related-party arrangements. It is expected that legally enforceable terms and conditions will typically be determined by the terms included in a written contract. This change in concept results in additional complexity regarding verbal contracts and written contracts with the potential for cancelation.

With the adoption of Topic 842, the accounting treatment for leases will be tied more closely to legal arrangements with less room for judgment around the substance of transactions that was used prior to Topic 842.

 

Other important reminders

 

What changed?

Prior to Topic 842, entities were only required to recognize leases classified as capital leases (now financing) on the balance sheet. For leases classified as operating leases, payments were reflected in the financial statements as rent expense on the income statement and the lease commitments were included in the disclosures of the financial statements.

The core principle of Topic 842 is that all leases (with minimal exceptions for certain leases) create an asset and a liability for the lessee. A lessee should recognize a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) on the balance sheet and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term.

When do I apply?

Public business entities or nonprofits that have issued, or are a conduit bond obligor for, securities that are traded, listed, or quoted on an exchange or an over-the-counter market

Annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 (e.g., December 31, 2020, year-end) and interim periods therein

Other entities

Annual periods beginning after December 15, 2021 (e.g., December 31, 2022, year-end) and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022

 

The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting, investment, or tax advice or opinion provided by CliftonLarsonAllen LLP (CliftonLarsonAllen) to the reader. For more information, visit CLAconnect.com.

 Airam Valdez is a Principal with CliftonLarsonAllen. He can be reached at Airam.Valdez@claconnect.com or 303.439.6062.

 

For more information, see the NASBP Surety Bond Quarterly article by Julian Xavier, Managing Principal of CliftonLarsonAllen's Construction Industry Group, “The Impact of the ASC 842 on a Contractor’s Financial Statement.”

0 comments
12 views

Permalink